A shed load of ideas…

Since our planning application was rejected, we’ve started questioning other aspects of the plans which were, at least in planning terms, acceptable. A weekend spent with my parents has called into question our thoughts for a new garage.

Garage R1 SS

We had originally proposed to build a new detached single garage between us and next door to match the style of one of the sister houses further down the road.

One controversial alternative, is to bring the new garage forward slightly and to extend the current porch right the way across..

Garage R2 SS

I’m not sure how this would actually look in practice, either from the front or on the side. Also, I’m in 2 minds as to whether having a ‘porch’ in front of a garage is odd..

The third option is to attach the garage to the side of the house, slightly further back and to mirror the porch roof. The thinking being that if ever future planning restrictions were relaxed, we may have the opportunity to build on top.

Garage R3 SS

Think I’ll drop the builders a line to see if we can at least rule any out on cost grounds.

Feeling withdrawn…

So today was D day on the planning application and sadly, we’ve been advised to withdraw by the council.

We had been hoping to build a modest 2 storey extension to the rear and side, however our proposals are evidently unneighbourly.

Unneighbourly

“Unneighbourly”

Evidently any form of 2 storey extension on the left hand side is going to be a non-starter which puts us back to the drawing board. The architects we spoke to and the local planner indicated it’s unlikely that we would be allowed to do any form of 2 storey extension on the right hand side, so we’re left with the option of single storey extensions to the sides or a double storey to the rear.

Of course the bigger question of whether to extend at all still remains open. We were hoping to enlarge the kitchen slightly and to get an en-suite in to any upstairs bedroom. These are our current floor plans:

Oakleigh Floor Plans

Any suggestions? 🙂

More on the “R” Question..

The question of exactly how best to re-render the house still remains open, but further research and information is upon us.

Technology at the time in 1911 was to build houses with solid (non-cavity) walls and Oakleigh is certainly no exception. This prevents a problem for rendered buildings with natural moisture becoming trapped in the walls and being unable to escape thus causing and or render problems allegedly.

I’ve discovered a good internet forum which I shall be looking to for matters of advise and discussion over at: http://www.periodproperty.co.uk/forum/index.php

Turn of the century solid wall properties evidently present somewhat of a quandary since some were supposedly designed to take a cement based render whereas other and all earlier buildings would require a breathable ‘lime’ based render.

In true ‘Homes under the Hammer Style’ – lets call in the experts…

Google had yielded the existance to me of ‘Insulated Render’.

Insulated Render

This seems on paper like a reasonable solution for a number of reasons. The various layers are designed to prevent any water ingress hence removing the problem of internal damp. It’s also a neat way to dramatically increase the u value of our walls and to hence potentially lower our heating bills.

So – the first folk we got round were insulated render specialists. “Insulated render is exactly what you need Sir, nothing else will work… It will cure all your problems” went the sales pitch. Sadly with the ensuing quote, the company was also trying to clear third world debt or double it depending on which side of the fence you’re looking. Suffice to say, we won’t be going the insulated render route. A consideration of an insulated solution is that the insulation adds 150mm thickness to the walls. For us, this which would also mean having to faff around with the windows, cills, corbels, bits of the roof – so even cost aside, I don think this would fly.

Next up, was the regular high street render company. “Oh no Sir, a regular cement based render is all you need. We use a waterproof and breathable additive which means you wont have any problems with damp…” went the sales pitch. The resultant quote was much more in line with our expectations.

But the good folk over at www.periodproperty.co.uk had been extolling the virtues of Lime, so the final expert in the line up so far was a lime render specialist.

“..Oh no sir, a cement render would never work. You will always have the same problem. You must have a lime finish..” went the sales pitch. I’m beginning to spot a theme here. That said, I was thoroughly impressed with the lime guy. He made several suggestions including removing the render from below our slate DPC to leave exposed brick to prevent any damp bridging across it. I was also interested to learn that like a cement based render, lime can also be roughcast or smooth. His quote came in around 20% more than the cement guys, so I think is probably our favourite candidate at the moment.

More I’m sure will follow in the coming months..